Countries that rely on Cuban medical missions are now entering new bilateral health cooperation agreements, particularly with the United States. This creates a new policy reality: governments are no longer limited to one model of international health cooperation — they are now navigating two fundamentally different approaches at the same time.

At the center of this analysis is a simple but critical question: How should countries balance immediate healthcare needs with long-term system sustainability and governance standards?

Cuban medical missions provide rapid staffing solutions. They have been widely used to fill urgent gaps in healthcare systems, especially in underserved regions. However, extensive reporting has raised concerns related to limited transparency of contracts and financial flows, indirect payment structures where compensation is routed through state entities, restrictions affecting medical personnel’s mobility and legal protections, and, significant concerns over forced labor.

Bilateral health cooperation agreements, by contrast, focus on training and retaining domestic health workers, strengthening national health institutions, measurable results and formal oversight mechanisms

These frameworks are transparent and aligned with domestic legal systems — but they require time to deliver results.

For the first time, many countries are operating both models simultaneously. This overlap is not theoretical. It is already visible in countries such as Guatemala, Dominican Republic, Mozambique, Guinea.

In these contexts, governments must manage parallel systems that differ in governance structures , financial transparency, labor protections and long-term sustainability.

This is not just a technical issue of health cooperation. It raises broader policy questions:

• how public funds are managed

• how foreign workers are protected

• how national health systems are built over time

Countries may continue to rely on external medical deployments for immediate needs, while using bilateral agreements to reduce long-term dependence. But doing both at once requires navigating complex legal, administrative, and ethical trade-offs.

The bottom line

International health cooperation is entering a transitional phase. Cuban medical missions remain a key source of short-term capacity. At the same time, bilateral agreements are expanding the policy space, offering more structured and transparent alternatives.

Understanding how these models interact — and where they create tensions — is essential for designing health systems that are both effective today and sustainable tomorrow.

See full Analytical Paper on this link

At its core, the Cuban medical mission model in Mexico is characterized by state-to-state contracting, indirect employment relationships, and centralized financial control mechanisms. Payments for medical services are routed through Cuban state entities, with limited transparency regarding individual remuneration. Evidence across reporting cycles consistently indicates that a significant portion of salaries is retained by Cuban authorities, while medical personnel receive only partial compensation. At the same time, contractual arrangements remain confidential, and host-country institutions have limited oversight over employment conditions and financial flows.

The analysis further demonstrates that Mexico occupies a distinct position within the regional landscape of Cuban medical missions. While several countries in Latin America and the Caribbean—including Honduras, Guatemala, and Jamaica—have moved toward termination, renegotiation, or restructuring of agreements, Mexico has maintained large-scale cooperation. This sustained engagement occurs despite increasing public debate, investigative reporting, and international attention focused on issues of transparency, labor conditions, and financial arrangements.

Across the reporting period, the Mexican case evolves from a structurally referenced example to a central analytical and policy-relevant case. Early reports identify core features such as opacity and centralized control, while later reporting introduces more detailed financial data, governance analysis, and comparative regional perspectives. By early 2026, Mexico is increasingly positioned as a key reference point for understanding how Cuban medical missions operate within host-country systems and how these arrangements are shaped by broader political and economic dynamics.

The evidence also highlights a distinct evidentiary profile in the Mexican context. Compared to other countries, Mexico is characterized by a relatively lower volume of testimony-based reporting but consistent identification of structural indicators associated with forced labor risk, including wage withholding, movement restrictions, and administrative control mechanisms. This pattern suggests that the limited availability of testimonies reflects constraints in visibility and reporting channels rather than the absence of underlying structural dynamics.

From a governance perspective, the findings point to a significant accountability gap. By contracting exclusively with Cuban state entities and excluding individual workers from formal contractual relationships, host-country institutions effectively defer responsibility for labor conditions. This arrangement contributes to the normalization of opaque financial practices and limits the applicability of domestic labor protections. At the same time, emerging scrutiny within Mexico indicates growing awareness of these governance challenges, although this has not yet translated into substantive policy changes.

Overall, the paper concludes that Cuban medical missions in Mexico demonstrate a pattern of sustained engagement amid regional fragmentation. The Mexican case illustrates how such missions can remain operational and politically supported even as other countries reassess their participation. At the same time, increasing scrutiny and expanding analytical evidence suggest that issues of transparency, accountability, and labor governance are likely to play a more prominent role in shaping future developments.

Link to full document